Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Equity Analysis's avatar

Hi Alf, nice article.

I agree with you because I don't believe the Fed will hike interest rates, for instance. Assuming nominal rates stay fixed while inflation runs hot, real rates will decrease, which will also help riskier assets and gold.

This is assuming that Warsh doesn't believe inflation is driven by rate cuts, but rather that it stems from excessive government spending.

I would also say that Kevin believes AI will reduce costs, causing inflation to decline gradually. Long story short, I'm still bullish.

Eelco Ubbels's avatar

The FOMC voting arithmetic is the most underappreciated constraint in the current rate debate. Alf's count is correct: even assuming the three May dissenters plus Barr vote for a hike, you still need four more from a group where Warsh is actively exploring trimmed mean PCE as a lower inflation benchmark specifically to create cover for cuts. The market is pricing hikes.

The institution cannot deliver them without a majority that does not yet exist. That gap between market pricing and institutional arithmetic is where the "Run It Hot" thesis lives. From a TAA perspective, the trades Alf identifies, small caps, EM equities, gold, copper, are precisely the positions that have seen the least institutional interest this week.

Tactically, Emerging Markets sit at 28.6% overweight with a rising trend, while Gold holds a high conviction positive view. Yet the option market is pricing gold puts over calls for the first time in years. Federated Hermes notes that EM "fundamentals remain intact" and the region is "well-positioned to benefit from potential easing in developed market monetary policy," Federated Hermes, Asset Allocation Award winner 2026.

The market is positioned for the Fed that the voting arithmetic cannot produce.

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?