Hey, this is Alf speaking - welcome back to The Macro Compass!
Given the large influx of paid subscribers at the previous round, we are extending our big discount also to our cheapest tier - The Long Term Investor.
Here is why you should take the offer:
A) You will read my macro insights every single week (also on our mobile app!)
B) If you are quick, you get 40% OFF. Locked in forever.
C) This could be it. Next year we might close to new retail subscriptions.
Yes, you read it correctly.
As we are getting a large influx of institutional demand, next year we might be closing subscriptions at retail-friendly prices.
This is why today I am telling you: go for it.
The first 20 TMC readers who will use the code MACROFRIDAY for our Long-Term tier will get 40% OFF forever.
You’ll end up paying only EUR 239/year.
That’s only ~20 bucks a month to read my macro insights every single week.
The offer is valid only for TODAY!
Use the link below. Be amongst the 20 who get in:
Now, to the piece.
Trump is back slashing (or should we say: threatening) tariffs left, right and center.
The more gradual approach suggested by his inner circle is nowhere to be seen.
It seems like this Trump presidency will bring more volatility than the previous one.
And if you think about it, it actually makes sense.
Controlling the House and the Senate, Trump is empowered to run his last and more aggressive agenda: in Musk’s words ‘’it’s now or never’’ for implementing policies.
I feel like Trump has little to lose here, and he is calling the shots.
When it comes to markets, I believe it’s good practice to look at what happened in 2016.
The world isn’t the same, but Trump’s policies seem to move broadly in the same direction and even if history doesn’t repeat it often rhymes:
The chart at page 1 shows the Sharpe Ratio for the top 7 risk-adjusted trades in the 45 days subsequent to Trump’s surprise win in 2016.
We chose risk-adjusted returns over absolute returns to avoid giving an advantage to highly volatile assets like Bitcoin – in absolute return terms, the most volatile asset will always prevail given favorable conditions.
The 7 trades all make sense from a macro standpoint.
Stock markets and in particular small-caps and banks benefit from Trump’s economic and de-regulation agenda; yields move up as nominal growth is seen increasing; the USD strengthens against low yielders and countries hit by tariffs and Bitcoin acts as the perfect de-regulation friendly, animal spirit asset class.
Let’s now look at today.
We overlapped the 2024 performance with the 2016 performance for the top 7 ‘’Trump trades’’.
In choosing the ‘’day 0’’ for 2024 we opted for the day when the Republican sweep odds moved above 50% on Polymarket: at that point, a Red Wave was already priced as base case similar to November 9th 2016 when it was clear Trump had won.
Here is how the ‘’Top Trump Trades’’ look priced today:
Here are 3 observations from my side:
1) Trump Trades in the stock market are experiencing a milder rally than in 2016;
2) The FX market seems unimpressed too;
3) Bitcoin has front-loaded all the 2016 gains in less than half the time.
Every time there seems to be an obvious trade we should always ask ourselves why should it be so easy.
In this case: can we safely assume there is a lot of juice left in USDMXN or stocks?Has Bitcoin already run its course?
For the Trump Trades in the stock market, one reason why we are lagging behind could be valuations.
The S&P500 wasn’t nearly so expensive in late 2016 from a forward P/E perspective, and therefore a long stock position here relies heavily on earnings to deliver as valuations are already high.
In FX, I can explain USDJPY – the Ministry of Finance in Japan limits the upside there.
But why would USDMXN not trade much higher as it did in 2016?
It seems FX markets are leaning towards tariffs being used as a negotiating mechanism rather than actual sizable tariffs being imposed on several countries in the end.
I think FX markets are largely underestimating Trump 2.0 and the volatility he will bring.
But also remember that in the medium term, macro conditions >>> reaction to short-term political agendas:
The chart above broadens the perspective on Trump Trades and it looks at 180 trading days after a Trump victory became clear in 2016 and 2024.
Notice how:
- US banks and small caps almost flat-lined after the initial enthusiasm, while the S&P500 kept going
- A short 10-year bond position lost money after the initial burst
- USDMXN longs ended up losing (!) money after 180 trading days
- Bitcoin kept going vertical and the punchiest part of the rally only happened much later
In 2017, global economies exhibited a miraculous concerted global growth amidst disinflation.
When it comes to 2025, I am not so sure that should be the base case.
I think Trump 2.0 is very much focused on foreign policy, and that this time around tariffs will become an important macro theme that stays with us for a long time.
If I am right, Trump 2.0 might sacrifice some short-term growth in exchange for harsher tariffs to pressure foreign economies to ‘’rebalance’’.
The outcome would be an increase in short-term inflation expectation but coupled with weaker growth, and a Fed likely to ‘’look through’’ the inflationary threat from tariffs to protect the US economy.
If that unfolds: most financial assets suffer, bonds do ok, the USD acts as a hedge.
This was it for today, thanks for reading.
Feel free to share the piece with a friend or colleague:
Before you go - don’t forget to take advantage of the offer.
It’s valid only for TODAY!
The first 20 TMC readers who will use the code MACROFRIDAY for our Long-Term tier will get 40% OFF forever.
You’ll end up paying only EUR 239/year.
That’s only ~20 bucks a month to read my macro insights every single week.
The offer is valid only for TODAY!
Use the link below. Be amongst the 20 who get in:
Come vedi eurusd?
Ieri sera guardavo su youtube il video di un tradar italiano con esperienza pluridecennale che riteneva il cambio eurodollaro in ipervenduto con l'euro destinato a puntare ad 1,15 proprio perchè le tariffe sarebbero un mezzo bluff e trump vorrebbe un dollaro più debole.
Io al momento la vedo diversamente.
C'è da dire che i cambi dipendono da fattori su cui la politica ha poco peso a meno che non ti chiami Cina, perchè in quel caso non esiste separazione dei poteri e non c'è il problema della mancanza di manodopera.
Trump afferma che vuole il dollaro debole:
1) per diminuire le importazioni e quindi sostituire quello che non importa con quello che viene prodotto internamente
2) per aumentare le esportazioni.
Il punto numero 1 lo persegue anche con i dazi. Il suo problema è che l'america non ha la capacità produttiva di sostituire quello che importa ed aumentare quello che esporta perchè è praticamente già a livello di piena occupazione. Lui vuole pure chiudere le frontiere e deportare migranti che sono quelli che fanno il lavoro sporco tenendo bassi i costi della manodopera. In un sistema gold standard il meccanismo sarebbe stato più semplice perchè con lo squilibrio della bilancia commerciale automaticamente ci sarebbe stato il deprezzamento della valuta che importa di più.
Il cambio è per difinizione un valore relativo e nel caso eurusd relativo all'euro.
Leggevo da uno studio riportato da Joachim Klement che attualmente il 42% del commercio globale coinvolge almeno un Paese europeo.
Con la situazione politico economica questo dato sembrerebbe destinato a contrarsi e con esso immagino la forza relativa dell'euro rispetto alle altre major.
Ed a maggior ragione l'europa avrebbe bisogno di stimoli monetari e fiscali piu forti di quelli della concorrenza con conseguenze sulla valuta.