32 Comments
User's avatar
Marco A Sudano's avatar

It is a very interesting and didactic article . Reminded us market players the mechanisms os markets liquidity . Cheers

Andrés Montes García's avatar

Fantastic, Alf!! Is it similar in the case of the ECB?

Alfonso Peccatiello (Alf)'s avatar

Not exactly, the Euro Area monetary plumbing structure is a bit different. For instance here in the Eurozone we don't have a big money market fund industry

Pavan Panchal's avatar

Excellent insights! Great work.

Julian P's avatar

Thanks Alf, very interesting and clearly explained. Cheers!

Akshat Rohatgi's avatar

Please start the fund soon!

Daniele Vecchi's avatar

conclusion: the FED will stop QT sooner than later. Not only, will also start to cut rates as soon as the chance to do it without excessive criticism will pop up. election year, banks ALM disaster, government funding...all points to lower short term rates other than the economy and inflation

Adrian Knoblauch's avatar

This is excellent!

gpkaralis's avatar

You might as well start a fund. Bianco doesn't understand money at all and they gave him a fund.

And I agree with you in the aggregate we've just entered the tipping point on liquidity, but even though a little early from a pricing perspective this past October - November was probably it in terms of an entry point. And with the 5% positive carry locked in on the treasuries we can wait.

User's avatar
Comment removed
Aug 2, 2024
Comment removed
gpkaralis's avatar

My opportunity cost is too high, but I wish you all the best.

Lori Lacour's avatar

I am thrilled to find you in substack. I listened to you last year on real vision. You are the true bond king. Thanks for sharing your knowledge with us.

Alton Cogert's avatar

So, to keep the flow into MMF, the Fed bias would be to continue the inverted yield curve? A bias to only slowly consider dropping short term rates, unless long term rates go lower first?

Nad She's avatar

Great work. Certainly, that shows how well you understand the ongoing process. Many thanks for sharing the wisdom, Alfonso.

Harry's avatar

It would be great to have the above info from a UK centric viewpoint.

Mark Strand's avatar

Thanks. In your opinion, what accounts for the seeming correlation between “liquidity” and asset prices? I’m not sure commentators who say the Fed drives stock prices are using a consistent definition of “liquidity” but generally when you ask for an explanation of the process of how “liquidity” generated by Fed actions finds its way into asset prices in near real time they don’t respond. Sven Henrich would be an example. Yet they provide a FRED chart that overlays their chosen liquidity metric on top of the S&P 500 and it does show some correlation. But “correlation is not causation”. Is there some indirect connection between Fed driven liquidity and asset prices? Thanks again.

Andrew's avatar

So MMF usually has enough cash rolled in RRP. But as besides the normal bonds and bills they purchase. So as the RRP decreases, it would indicate that MMF excess cash is also decreasing. So much so, at some point MMF would not have enough cash to buy any more treasury issuance

Patrick's avatar

Very inspiring insights! Could you please let me know what GC repo rate on Bloomberg you are using to plot the last graph?

MXLTN's avatar

so would it be fair to say that most of the money printed in 2020-2021 went to RRF, from where they are migrating now to short term gov bonds / bills, meaning they are going back to the government to get recycled again but now from the fiscal side into economy ?